Comparison of the display in the benchmark with anti-aliasing MSAA and without anti-aliasing on Windows!
Contents:
1.) ...The difference in image quality when anti-aliasing!
2.) ... anti-aliasing on Windows there are some important differences!
1.) The difference in image quality when anti-aliasing!
The difference in image quality is clearly visible, the representation in 3D with anti-aliasing MSAA and without anti-aliasing. However, the MSAA anti-aliasing also costs a bit of performance on the graphics card, depending on the GK model, 15 to 50%. But it is visually much more appealing than without anti-aliasing.
Here at 2x magnification, MSAA can be easily recognized in the ► 3D Benchmark OK !
See also: ► Why is my Intel HD graphics card slower than the others?
| (Image-1) Anti-aliasing MSAA on Windows in 3D! |
 |
2.) Anti-aliasing on Windows there are some important differences!
When displaying in the benchmark with MSAA (Multisample Anti-Aliasing) and without anti-aliasing under Windows, there are a few important differences to note:
1. Image quality:
With MSAA, the edges of objects appear smoother, which leads to higher overall image quality. Without anti-aliasing, visible staircase effects can occur, especially with diagonal lines and edges.
2. Performance:
Using MSAA increases GPU (graphics processing unit) requirements as multiple samples must be calculated per pixel. Without anti-aliasing, performance is typically better because fewer calculations are required.
3. Resource consumption:
Due to the additional calculations, MSAA requires more memory and computing power. Without anti-aliasing, resource consumption is lower.
4. User Preference:
Some users may prefer the sharper appearance without anti-aliasing, while others may prefer the softer edges produced by MSAA.
Info:
A benchmark typically tests both display modes to evaluate performance and quality under different conditions. Results may vary depending on hardware, software and the specific requirements of the application.
A benchmark typically tests both display modes to evaluate performance and quality under different conditions. Results may vary depending on hardware, software and the specific requirements of the application.
